Research Room workspace
A researcher-facing environment for milestones, notes, literature planning, meetings, viva preparation and research organisation.
- Project dashboard
- Milestone planning
- Literature matrix
- Supervisor meeting planner
Give eligible researchers access to a structured digital workspace, free research tools, planning resources and optional human support under an institution-defined access model.
Rather than forcing every cohort into the same package, Thesis Tutors can combine live teaching, specialist clinics, digital research tools and targeted one-to-one support around the institution’s actual gaps.
A researcher-facing environment for milestones, notes, literature planning, meetings, viva preparation and research organisation.
A broad toolkit that supports planning, methodology thinking, ethics preparation, data analysis choices and submission readiness.
Define who receives access, the licence term, cohort structure and any institution-funded support alongside the digital workspace.
Create a clear starting route so researchers understand what the platform does, what it does not do and where human support sits.
Combine software access with clinics, workshops, support pools or specialist consultations rather than forcing every user into a paid 1-to-1 model.
Agree data handling, reporting scope, programme ownership, escalation routes and renewal review before wider use.
A clear implementation sequence keeps responsibilities, academic-integrity boundaries, communications and support routes understandable for both staff and researchers.
Confirm cohort size, programme need, admin model and required support components.
Prepare access, researcher onboarding, institution-specific guidance and agreed support routes.
Invite the initial cohort with clear instructions and a defined help route.
Assess uptake, usability, support demand and the case for continuation or expansion.
Thesis Tutors is designed to complement formal supervision and existing university services. We support researcher development through teaching, coaching, feedback, legitimate editing and specialist guidance; we do not write assessed theses or make academic decisions on behalf of researchers.
Researchers retain responsibility for the ideas, analysis, arguments, decisions and final work they submit.
Institutional delivery can be designed around the minimum data needed for access, support and agreed reporting.
Specialist expertise remains central where judgement, teaching and methodological explanation are required.
No. Our institutional work is supplementary. Formal supervision, assessment and academic decisions remain with the university and researcher.
Yes. Delivery can be scoped around degree level, discipline mix, programme calendar, cohort size, research stage and the institution’s own policies.
Support focuses on teaching, coaching, feedback, skills development and legitimate editing. Researchers remain responsible for the ideas, analysis, decisions and assessed work they submit.
Yes. A defined pilot or clinic is often the simplest route for testing demand, delivery fit and administration before a wider programme is considered.
We can help you shape a pilot, clinic, workshop series, support pool or Research Room licence without committing the institution to a larger programme before the model has been tested.