Fair-access model
Institutions can define who is eligible and how hours are allocated.
- Eligibility rules
- Per-user caps
- Cohort allocation
- Approval workflow
Give eligible researchers access to an agreed bank of one-to-one support hours funded by the institution and used only for approved research-development purposes.
Rather than forcing every cohort into the same package, Thesis Tutors can combine live teaching, specialist clinics, digital research tools and targeted one-to-one support around the institution’s actual gaps.
Institutions can define who is eligible and how hours are allocated.
Requests can be routed to methodology, statistics, qualitative, software, writing or viva expertise.
Researchers can use support when a genuine need arises rather than attending generic sessions that may not fit.
Sessions remain educational and advisory, with the researcher responsible for decisions and assessed work.
Institutions can receive agreed aggregate information such as hours used and broad support categories.
Usage evidence helps determine whether the pool should be renewed, expanded or redesigned.
A clear implementation sequence keeps responsibilities, academic-integrity boundaries, communications and support routes understandable for both staff and researchers.
Agree the number of hours or credits and the eligible cohort.
Provide eligible researchers with the booking route and boundaries.
Match each request to the appropriate support category and specialist.
Track aggregate utilisation and decide how to use remaining capacity.
Thesis Tutors is designed to complement formal supervision and existing university services. We support researcher development through teaching, coaching, feedback, legitimate editing and specialist guidance; we do not write assessed theses or make academic decisions on behalf of researchers.
Researchers retain responsibility for the ideas, analysis, arguments, decisions and final work they submit.
Institutional delivery can be designed around the minimum data needed for access, support and agreed reporting.
Specialist expertise remains central where judgement, teaching and methodological explanation are required.
No. Our institutional work is supplementary. Formal supervision, assessment and academic decisions remain with the university and researcher.
Yes. Delivery can be scoped around degree level, discipline mix, programme calendar, cohort size, research stage and the institution’s own policies.
Support focuses on teaching, coaching, feedback, skills development and legitimate editing. Researchers remain responsible for the ideas, analysis, decisions and assessed work they submit.
Yes. A defined pilot or clinic is often the simplest route for testing demand, delivery fit and administration before a wider programme is considered.
We can help you shape a pilot, clinic, workshop series, support pool or Research Room licence without committing the institution to a larger programme before the model has been tested.