Branded entry point
Create a coherent access route for the institution’s eligible researchers.
- Institution landing page
- Programme description
- Eligibility guidance
- Support links
Create an institution-specific entry experience for selected Thesis Tutors resources and support pathways while preserving clear service ownership, academic-integrity boundaries and governance.
Rather than forcing every cohort into the same package, Thesis Tutors can combine live teaching, specialist clinics, digital research tools and targeted one-to-one support around the institution’s actual gaps.
Create a coherent access route for the institution’s eligible researchers.
Surface only the tools, Academy resources and pathways that fit the agreed programme.
Explain how the service complements local supervision and what researchers should expect.
Different cohorts can receive different access, clinics or support pools.
Define which party owns communication, user administration, data handling and support escalation.
Assess whether the configured experience is actually useful before extending it.
A clear implementation sequence keeps responsibilities, academic-integrity boundaries, communications and support routes understandable for both staff and researchers.
Set the permitted institution naming, marks and attribution.
Choose which resources, services and cohorts are included.
Build the institution-specific access route and onboarding.
Check usability, governance and service fit before wider rollout.
Thesis Tutors is designed to complement formal supervision and existing university services. We support researcher development through teaching, coaching, feedback, legitimate editing and specialist guidance; we do not write assessed theses or make academic decisions on behalf of researchers.
Researchers retain responsibility for the ideas, analysis, arguments, decisions and final work they submit.
Institutional delivery can be designed around the minimum data needed for access, support and agreed reporting.
Specialist expertise remains central where judgement, teaching and methodological explanation are required.
No. Our institutional work is supplementary. Formal supervision, assessment and academic decisions remain with the university and researcher.
Yes. Delivery can be scoped around degree level, discipline mix, programme calendar, cohort size, research stage and the institution’s own policies.
Support focuses on teaching, coaching, feedback, skills development and legitimate editing. Researchers remain responsible for the ideas, analysis, decisions and assessed work they submit.
Yes. A defined pilot or clinic is often the simplest route for testing demand, delivery fit and administration before a wider programme is considered.
We can help you shape a pilot, clinic, workshop series, support pool or Research Room licence without committing the institution to a larger programme before the model has been tested.